23.04.2014, 10:46
|
Язык оригинала: Русский
#1
|
Гуру
Регистрация: 26.07.2008
Адрес: РФ, Самара
Сообщений: 75,397
Спасибо: 27,867
Поблагодарили 55,330 раз(а) в 24,283 сообщениях
Репутация: 102390
|
Restorer war memorial faces six years in prison
On Wednesday in the town of Volokolamsk court announced the verdict in the exotic and the case in the history of Russian embezzlement case of German self-propelled guns , mounted on the memorial to the heroes - sappers .
Цитата:
In the dock - a young but already famous Moscow historian and restorer, philanthropist and collector of antique weapons and tanks - Dmitry Busmachiu . He is accused of that back in 2011 , during the reconstruction of the memorial to the soldiers- sappers at the 114th kilometer of Volokolamsk highway , he replaced the original German self-propelled " Shtug " on novodelnuyu . More precisely , according to the prosecutor's office , he "has replaced the parts on the aftermarket part that caused the actual destruction of the main fragment of the monument of history and damage totaling about 4 million rubles."
On the eve of the prosecutor Valery Lokotkov asked for a 33-year Bushmakova no less six years in colony. The prosecutor's decision came as a shock as the accused with his defense, and the few spectators present at the trial , including the correspondent "RG" .
Honestly : 's longstanding practice court reporter with such an unusual and interesting process for the first time I encounter . First, I've never seen that all the prosecution witnesses - more than twenty people , testified in defense of the accused completely refuting built consequence version. Even the prosecutor after another examination of the witness could not resist: "It's all wrong any witnesses - they only say in defense ."
...............
Yes, and the most interesting : during the trial and has not been proven that the theft , and most importantly selfish intent restorer. Moreover, for today's verdict in the left side of the victim - the Ministry of Culture of the Moscow region said that the monument is not standing on its balance sheet , and belongs to the city . City officials , in turn, refused to recognize themselves as victims and said they did not have any claims to Bushmakovu . That is, it actually means that if in the case of embezzlement nobody recognized as a victim , it can not be the case itself .
|
Fully read here.
|
|
|