Who has more rights - the author or curator?

[Tamila]

Fotografer.ru to read an article about stewardship in the photos, the problems in the selection of works in the exhibition.

In the past year there was a scandal in Krasnodar. During the festival Photovisa a curator, whose name is for the general public remained unknown, without the knowledge of the author has withdrawn one of the works of the solo exhibition of Sergey Maximishin. As it was a hot favorite of all the portrait of Vladimir Vladimirovich, the story immediately taken on political overtones, although the exhibition organizers strongly hinted that there are no politics in this, and the picture just does not fit in an exhibition series, built this unknown curator, falls out of his curatorial, sorry concept. This whole story somehow became known to the author and it provoked sharp reaction - Maximishin demanded the return of or exposure to, or immediate dismantling of the exposition. What in the end it was over we do not know, but it seemed not important. The main thing, as always - talk.
Kostya Smolyaninov
http://www.photographer.ru/columnist...#. UTBP-DCppKJ

Surely with such problems experienced gallerists and curators in the formation of exhibitions of artists. So who has more rights?

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Originally Posted by Tamila

As it was beloved by all portrait of Vladimir Vladimirovich, the story immediately taken on political overtones

Here is the famous photo:

[zarajara]

Originally Posted by Cyril Syzran

Here is the famous photo:

Once a famous photo, maybe it was a joint advertising creative artist and curator?
>

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Originally Posted by zarajara

Once celebrity photos, maybe it was a joint advertising creative artist and curator?
>

This artist does not need this kind of advertising.

[Tamila]

But still . It is clear that the curator of the exhibition forms , selects the work according to his undertaking. And if the author ( photographer /artist ) does not like it, and there are disputes , up to the removal of exposure. I wonder whose side the law ( in the case of , say , financial losses )? For me, it's just idle interest .

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Tamila, you have the example of a large exhibition and collaboration , where the removal of one thing , or even as a result of conflicts of all the works of a single author koordinalno neither the concept nor the soma does not affect exposure .
And if it goes on, for example , personal , there can only advise the curator of the author or heirs, but it does not dictate.

[Konstantin]

Originally Posted by Tamila

And yet

Here the question is not who's in the law, and who is more authoritative and more important for the exhibition.

[Магнолия]

Originally Posted by Tamila

But still.

The civil law is emphasizing the concept of "contract".
All is not taken into account the agreement is governed by the settlement or judgment.