Bukowski in Helsinki

[uriart]

I propose to discuss several lots from the auction Bukowski in Helsinki.
 
Four works by Aivazovsky and two works Savrasov.

For more information, readers can see on the site.

https://www.bukowskis.com/auctions/F165?category []=161 & page = 1

№ 291-Aivazovsky - oil on canvas
20h17sm, 1848

№ 292 Aivazovsky - hmm.
20h17 cm 1848

Добавлено через 5 минут
№ 301.Ayvazovsky - d.m.27h22 cm 1887

№ 302. Aivazovsky - d.m.28h21 cm attached to this work

COA: L.S.Gavrilenko, G.N.Goldovsky

Добавлено через 4 минуты
№ 296 - Klodt, Michael K. (1832-1902)

COWS the water.


Oil on canvas.
29.5 h44, 5.
Signature.


Are in private collections in Finland since the 1950's.

Добавлено через 2 минуты
№ 299 Aleksey Savrasov (1830-1897)

WINTER LANDSCAPE.


Signature.
-91.
Oil on canvas, 27x21 cm

[uriart]

№ 301.Ayvazovsky - d.m.27h22 cm 1887

№ 302. Aivazovsky - d.m.28h21 cm attached to this work

COA: L.S.Gavrilenko, G.N.Goldovsky

[uriart]

№ 296 - Klodt, Michael K. (1832-1902)

COWS the water.


Oil on canvas.
29.5 h44, 5.
Signature.


Are in private collections in Finland since the 1950's.

[uriart]

№ 299 Aleksey Savrasov (1830-1897)

WINTER LANDSCAPE.


Signature.
-91.
Oil on canvas, 27x21 cm

[uriart]

I'm not an expert on creativity and Aivazovsky Savrasov.
But from what I saw in my life something in memory postponed.
Highly questionable , in my opinion of Aivazovsky, lots number 291 and number 292.
And work Klodt, also I doubt its authenticity.
That the work itself, so also the signature is imposed or even new. As a splint on it smells ?
It is interesting to hear the views of other members of the forum .

[мистер-у]

Aivazovsky the conclusion G.Ya.Goldovskogo doubts about the authenticity does not cause the other three of the weak, but in any case they are not interesting.
M.Klodt not like it, especially the sky and cows probably falshaki .
A.K.Savrasova winter is not bad, but far from masterpieces , I personally do not like the signature , some grubaya.Rabota it requires further study.

[Николай Левенко]

Сообщение от uriart; 2357361"

It is doubtful , in my opinion works by Aivazovsky, lots number 291 and number 292 .

Despite the signature , date , availability craquelure and partial shedding of the paint layer , as well as expert opinion G.Ya.Goldovskogo to work "Misty Morning at the shore " Lot number 302, in any of the four works presented as paintings I.Ayvazovsky , authorship seascape , in my opinion, is not visible. It is unfortunate that the canvas showing on all sides , we were deprived of the possibility to look at the very expert opinion.

[Kaffsky]

Сообщение от Nicholas Levenkov

Despite the signature ...
I.Ayvazovsky, authorship, seascape, in my opinion, is not seen ....

uriart, at 100%agree with colleagues
>
 

Only Tone I would be more definitive ...
>
 
all You provide to support the work-falsehood Aki!
>

[Дилетант]

Сообщение от uriart; 2357341"

№ 296 - Klodt, Michael K. (1832-1902)
COW near the water.

In these photos, the picture is feeble (as, indeed, look almost all the later work of Mikhail Konstantinovich Klodt). The fact that drank heavily (and just as much in need) in the last decade of his life monsieur le professeur repeatedly their most successful songs of the 1860 - 1870. Thus, the cows on the bank - one of these unfortunate stories, which have stood stopisyat reissues. There are two compositional schemes: a herd at the watering (well, this track will not write, it is well-known for publishing F.Bulgakova and meetings for at least 8 museums > (including - TG , RM, Ivanovo, Samara, Chelyabinsk, Tashkent museums.) and is a composition of "Cows on the beach", too often repeated Klodt (which is documented, koi, I fully disclose will not greatly fear in his old age to remain without a piece of bread > > >). So, these cows are in the collections of the Tyumen and two other Russian museums (not published) and in three - four private collections (some known works from the 1950's to the exhibitions at the Central House of Arts, etc.). Another is a picture (with the same scenery on the beach and rocks in shallow water, but - without the cows) - in Arkhangelsk Museum.
What I am about this for so long and tedious to write? But does not the fact that I - and hefty clever to x .. all know, not at all. I am writing this in order to make it clear: in this photograph of the picture with a uniquely klodtovskim plot and composition FIG atributiruesh!
I will say that I am embarrassed by the nature of craquelure in the sky. Klodt, of course, in recent years, much has passed, but the techniques and technology - do not spend on drink! (A Klodt - very "tech" artist. And very talented. Pity it). A cow - quite so-so; nazhoristye. Should be - milk yield.

[uriart]

Nicholas Levenkov, I think that you can ask for an expert opinion, and it will be sent on request.