Figure Shemyakin?

[John Preston]

That's got to hand such a thing.
Tiny size - 12 by 9.6 cm
Do not even know what made ​​probably ink and pencils.
In the lower left corner of the initials " SM 1965"

I understand that the final authorship can confirm only the Mikhail . But the post office, said on his official website is not working.
How can you get in touch with him to confirm the authorship?

[I-V]

John Preston, and the Fund Shemyakin you tried to contact?
They provide services in examination


http://mihfond.ru/?page_id=4908

Сообщение от John Preston

This has got into the hands of such a thing.

Thing, I confess, is not impressive.
Some sluggish and I would say the secondary ..

[John Preston]

Сообщение от IV

John Preston, and the Fund Shemyakin you tried to contact?
They provide services in examination


http://mihfond.ru/?page_id=4908

Many thanks for the tip, John.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от John Preston

Figure Shemyakin?

Well, that's entirely on his schedule 60 does not seem absolutely.

[AlexSpb]

If by " signs of aging " thing looks in the 65th year, the question is probably no . I came across these (style, dating , size) and I always thought they were related to his series of bookplates . Where does this information do not remember ( a lot of time has passed) , but if you check out as it should, I think, it is confirmed .

[artcol]

Сообщение от John Preston

In the lower left corner of the initials "SM 1965"

In addition to this, nothing more in favor of Shemyakin not say even a hint ...

[AlexSpb]

What's that , dear Artcol, it turns out - you do not believe ? Well, that , and so much more helpful to me in the last few days have exposed ... >
I say the same as that seen! And at a time when the conscious fakes it could hardly walk.
I'm not an expert on search, but even a simple Yandex shows that many bookplates at the time he did. And the fact that the " gallant scenes " in a style he began painting in high school , it is so well known.

And I am here for a long time this question is interesting . As I know, for it still has not specifically expressed .
Comparative evaluation illustrations for Dostoevsky Shemyakin and Ernst Neizvestny. I feel that open a separate topic not make much sense . But , who knows , maybe someone will want to write something ...

[Axolotl]

It is a variant of illustration Pocketbook "Spanish classic epigram" with drawings Shemyakin.
Author?
The big question ...
Rather - "based on", but maybe one of the first "nabrosochnyh" option, and signed Shemyakin almost everything.

[K-Maler]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran ; 2356591"

Well, that's entirely on his schedule 60 does not seem absolutely.
__________________

It's not like by the feeling aroused by his figures , they are always a little scary ... In the same figure (?) Too " lady " look, even girlish ...
Shemyakin looking for their early stuff , as he himself said ... so ...

[NATA NOVA]

Сообщение от AlexSpb; 2356851"

I always thought they were related to his series of bookplates

Would like to note :
Ex-libris (by its nature) must possess three qualities:
( which make mini graphics actually " bookplate "):
1. be duplicated (some vydy to 50 000 , and possibly even more)
2. contain the word " from the books " ( in any language)
3. Contain the name of the owner (organization , family , person , etc. ) in any language