Attributed to Pavel Kuznetsov? - Форум по искусству и инвестициям в искусство

khmelev · 19.09.2011, 16:38

this kind of work was bought at Sotheby's in 1995, the year of 6000 pounds.
Reproduced in the catalog.
At the time, was attributed to Pavel Kuznetsov, in what already had serious doubts.
But the thing is old and beautiful.

Watercolor on paper.
Size 50 to 70

uriart · 19.09.2011, 21:23

Now what?

For sale?

khmelev · 19.09.2011, 21:48

no

curious view of authorship

tivat · 19.09.2011, 22:43

Цитата:

Сообщение от khmelev

is such a job , bought at Sotheby's in 1995 , the year of 6000 pounds . Reproduced in the catalog. At the time, was attributed to Pavel Kuznetsov , in what already had serious doubts . But the thing is old and beautiful.
Watercolor on paper . Size 50 to 70

Khmelev, you believe that this work was sold at auction in 1995? checked?

Кирилл Сызранский · 19.09.2011, 23:16

Цитата:

Сообщение от tivat

Are you sure that this work was sold at auction in 1995?

See 15.
06, 1995, Lot 63.
They mark Attrib.

Сима · 20.09.2011, 00:00

I am not absolutely convinced. Especially such places - it glazik right woman. PV Kuznetsov, it seems , was not typical of a sequential cubistic stylization . First , he was older , if I may say so , " the style ". Secondly, it is empty for work , mindless , imitative , I would say . Do not like .

>

Кирилл Сызранский · 20.09.2011, 00:01

Цитата:

Сообщение от Sima

women glazik right

A left cheek?

Игорь Гурьев · 20.09.2011, 17:01

In my opinion, this picture is in general no relation to Paul Kuznetsova has not.

In a "catalog" it has been replicated?

khmelev · 20.09.2011, 19:26

in the catalog auction Sotheby's, sir.

19.09.2011, 16:38	Язык оригинала: Русский #1
khmelev Гуру Регистрация: 26.10.2008 Сообщений: 1,026 Спасибо: 75 Поблагодарили 915 раз(а) в 329 сообщениях Репутация: 1815	Attributed to Pavel Kuznetsov? this kind of work was bought at Sotheby's in 1995, the year of 6000 pounds. Reproduced in the catalog. At the time, was attributed to Pavel Kuznetsov, in what already had serious doubts. But the thing is old and beautiful. Watercolor on paper. Size 50 to 70

Похожие темы
Тема	Автор	Разделы	Ответов	Последние сообщения
The inhabitants of Rome are not happy with the monument to Pope John Paul II	Us-tin	Exhibitions and events	19	27.05.2011 14:17

19.09.2011, 21:23	Язык оригинала: Русский #2
uriart Banned Регистрация: 05.06.2008 Адрес: UKRAINE Сообщений: 8,039 Спасибо: 5,979 Поблагодарили 7,016 раз(а) в 2,462 сообщениях Репутация: 12460	Now what? For sale?

19.09.2011, 21:48	Язык оригинала: Русский #3
khmelev Гуру Регистрация: 26.10.2008 Сообщений: 1,026 Спасибо: 75 Поблагодарили 915 раз(а) в 329 сообщениях Репутация: 1815	no curious view of authorship

20.09.2011, 00:00	Язык оригинала: Русский #6
Сима Гуру Регистрация: 29.01.2009 Адрес: Москва Сообщений: 1,422 Спасибо: 2,395 Поблагодарили 2,244 раз(а) в 552 сообщениях Репутация: 4259	I am not absolutely convinced. Especially such places - it glazik right woman. PV Kuznetsov, it seems , was not typical of a sequential cubistic stylization . First , he was older , if I may say so , " the style ". Secondly, it is empty for work , mindless , imitative , I would say . Do not like . >

20.09.2011, 17:01	Язык оригинала: Русский #8
Игорь Гурьев Гуру Регистрация: 01.07.2009 Адрес: город П. Сообщений: 4,939 Спасибо: 6,544 Поблагодарили 6,620 раз(а) в 2,829 сообщениях Репутация: 13305	In my opinion, this picture is in general no relation to Paul Kuznetsova has not. In a "catalog" it has been replicated?

20.09.2011, 19:26	Язык оригинала: Русский #9
khmelev Гуру Регистрация: 26.10.2008 Сообщений: 1,026 Спасибо: 75 Поблагодарили 915 раз(а) в 329 сообщениях Репутация: 1815	in the catalog auction Sotheby's, sir.