Вернуться   Форум по искусству и инвестициям в искусство > English forum > Chatter
 English | Русский Forum ARTinvestment.RU RSS Регистрация Дневники Справка Сообщество Сообщения за день Поиск

Chatter General discussion.

 
 
Опции темы Опции просмотра
Старый 21.06.2011, 12:56 Язык оригинала: Русский       #1
Гуру
 
Аватар для NATA NOVA
 
Регистрация: 23.07.2009
Сообщений: 5,736
Спасибо: 8,058
Поблагодарили 4,382 раз(а) в 2,259 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 2
Репутация: 8507
Отправить сообщение для NATA NOVA с помощью Skype™
По умолчанию Sacred river of art and money (Donald Caspian Sea, art critic)

It is quite fascinating article, which formulated many answers to questions about the values ​​of art:
Quote:
  "The importance of art to date is that it makes money. It is not clear whether the money creating art, but just to say that they" patronize "the arts. The value of art is guaranteed money, that does not mean that no money will lose its value art, but the value of money dominates the artistic value, although originally intended to be a recognition of the latter. And art criticism and were defeated by money, although money and bring in an element of art criticism, confirming it as art. Moreover , money has become more existentially significant than the art.

I am even ready to defend the view that money is only seeking to fill the void of the existential meaning, which formed the art, having lost its spiritual destiny. In other words, investors, speculators, buying works of art as a tangible investment, and not for their spiritual value, thus denying her, showing his spiritual poverty and existential torpor. They may be compared with locusts, nicknamed as investors in hedge funds, making hostile offers, Franz Manterfering, former chairman of the German Social Democratic Party. "Locusts, ... which hits the field, leaving it bare ground and fly to another field. "[...]

I believe that money have invaded the sacred river and polluted the art of it, despite attempts to buy off their sins payment of money to artists. But apparently, the relationship between money and art still ended incest, suggesting that the properties of their future offspring, which has already manifested itself in the form of anti-artists. "



Donald Caspian Sea, art critic, art historian (the last three paragraphs of his article "The Value of Art or the value of money")
-----------------------
The whole article:
 Part One:
http://russianartguide.ru/business/12.php

Chasit Two:
http://russianartguide.ru/business/13.php

In the original:
http://agorasmenos.wordpress.com/201...-money-values/




Последний раз редактировалось NATA NOVA; 22.06.2011 в 12:19. Причина: Добавлено сообщение
NATA NOVA вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Этот пользователь сказал Спасибо NATA NOVA за это полезное сообщение:
Posav (22.06.2011)
 


Ваши права в разделе
Вы не можете создавать новые темы
Вы не можете отвечать в темах
Вы не можете прикреплять вложения
Вы не можете редактировать свои сообщения

BB коды Вкл.
Смайлы Вкл.
[IMG] код Вкл.
HTML код Выкл.

Быстрый переход

Похожие темы
Тема Автор Разделы Ответов Последние сообщения
First Christmas Festival of Sacred Music begins in Moscow Тютчев Exhibitions and events 0 09.01.2011 08:26
In Stavropol, a draft of Salvador Dali. Sacred Message " Moriakoff Exhibitions and events 0 05.01.2011 15:22
Test of Donald Trump iside Chatter 9 27.12.2009 14:12
Donald Caspian. The value of art or the value of money gans Investing in Art 1 08.10.2009 09:14
Alex Plutser-Sarno, art critic of contemporary art Евгений Artists, artworks, art history 15 25.08.2009 12:49





Часовой пояс GMT +3, время: 16:01.
Telegram - Обратная связь - Обработка персональных данных - Архив - Вверх


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. Перевод: zCarot