Exhibition graphics Mikhail Shvartsman in the Tretyakov Gallery

[Tamila]

Yesterday at the Small Hall of the Tretyakov Gallery Tolmachevskom Lane. exhibition was opened by Mikhail Shvartsman (1926-1997), founder of the concept ieratizma.
The widow of the artist Iraida Shvartsman introduced graphic works from the collection of the artist's Heritage Fund for the exhibition.
In the picture:
1 - Press Conference, Iraida Shvartsman, Lydia Iovleva - one of the organizers of the exhibition, Olga Yushkova - the leading expert on creativity Schwartzman
2 - Lydia Iovleva, and Joseph Kiblitsky, Valery Dudakov, Olga Yushkova
3 - picture of the artist
4 - Iraida Shvartsman
5 - general plan

[Tamila]

The concept works hard to understand. The term "ieratizm" does not quite fit in the head. Much of this write and speak.
I am interested to view forumchan. do you think about his work? what is the perception of its "ieratur?
photo: technology paper /ink
1 - I Putevodi 1966-73
2 - The thought of her daughter in 1968
3 - Girl 1964
4 - The mysterious man 1965-66
5 - Alexis Kruchyonykh 1963-66
6 - Do not fulfilled yet ... 1970
7,8 - Ieratura Truth number 15 1982 b. graphite and color. ct.
9 - Ieratura Truth number 22 The first prophecy of 1976
10 - The mouths of the cycle number 2 1972-75 B. graphite and color. ct.

[Tamila]

The exhibition is unique in that represents the work of different years, from 60th to 80th, and allows us to trace the formation of an artist, an idea about the development of his creativity.
Photos:
1 - Hall of the early works of the artist
2 - Sanya from a bird market in 1963, paper /ink
3 - Black head 1966, paper /ink, felt-tip
4 - Dog 1960, paper /ink, tempera, mixed media. Tekhn.
5 - Sergei 1972, paper /ink
6 - Seated Boy 1960, paper /ink
7 - with a woman Bochkov 1963, paper /ink
The figure marked "barrel with a woman when drunk like at dusk to sing under the balalaika"
8 - ideas and thoughts of the artist, print
9, 10 - "exhibition"

[uriart]

My conservative view, probably few people will be interesting, yet!
I can understand easily. If a work of art touches the heart and soul to thrill, to the pain, to joy - this is art!
And when the audience explain how it is beautiful and nice and new - to me it is quite incomprehensible and uninteresting. I can not call it art. Maybe it's just a good job? A solid!
But it is not art!
I think that an artist should express their ideas in plain language of the people, then it will be understood in the semi-glance! And will either rejoice or suffer. And so ????????
And the names are clever invent - ieratizm.
And then what up? What other ism?

[Евгений]

Сообщение от uriart

come up with clever names such - ieratizm

  By topic: Shvartsman, Mikhail Matveevich (1926-1997), Russian painter http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showth...985&page=6
-------------------------------------------------- ---------
Tamila, good, collection of work, has long wanted to see it work.
Thank you very much for the pictures.

[Meister]

definitely this artist has a future, and, in my opinion, very successful ...