Lecture by Peter Greenaway on delivery Kandinsky Prize

[Yury Ryabchenyuk]

The first known to us the creation of human hands is a picture. And almost certainly can be argued that when civilization will fly into the nether-that is, of course, must necessarily happen, and happen-then in this last day - the day of Judgement - the latest creation of human hands on earth will also be painting.
I confess that I have great respect for art and artists.
Artists are always leading the way.
They are our eyes.
They teach us to be.
They have created a visible man-made world.
 "The fact that you have eyes does not mean that you are able to see."
 "The fact that you have the vocal cords, tongue and palate, does not mean that you can say."
Vision should be to teach and learn.
Similarly, how to learn to speak.
We do not emerge from a womb already knowing how to speak.
We do not emerge from a womb already knowing how to look.
And, here I am deliberately provoke you - most people are visually illiterate.
If we talk about the images, most people do not realize what they are watching.
Not that this was their fault.
For most people, visual education usually ends at about the age of ten, eleven, twelve.
Umberto Eco has always firmly believed in the digital visual revolution, says that over eight thousand years - is that it is so much history is stored in written sources - a civilization ruled by the master text. They wrote all the Sacred Books, and all the comments on these sacred books. Eternal cycle of credit to the texts themselves.

Читать дальше... 

They wrote a volume of moral and ethical, political, legal precepts.
They have written all textbooks and materials for reading manuals.
They invented all the books on manners and etiquette.
With the help of texts they have sent our thoughts and ideas, the way we live, how we make love, how to change the baby diaper, build a warship.
And then they watch and jealously guarded by those texts, taking them step by step down from the literate to the illiterate.
Our civilization rests on the text, the word in it above all else.
Beginning in 1980, we are witnessing an guttenbergovskaya second revolution - and we all know that I did with the communication and, consequently, the world thought, the first revolution of Gutenberg - Literacy has created the modern world, and now the digital revolution liberates us otherwise, have through imaginative communication - so that on the way next revolution - a revolution of visual literacy.
Umberto Eco argues that the master of the text finally have to step aside and let the masters - but by and large for the first time in history and craftswomen - images come to the fore and reformulate the basis of communication, focusing on the angle of the image.
But if we expect that this revolution will highlight communication, we need a visually literate civilization. Which we have not.
I used to think that such an education can give the cinema, but now doubt it, because in a strange way we do not have a movie that would be placed at the center of the image.
Relative to the general population, very few people go to art schools, colleges of design, have an architectural education.
If we compare with the way we learn to handle the text, but we call him an unusually well-even despite the language barrier - learning the alphabet, while still very young, accumulating huge amounts of vocabulary in childhood, learning the intricate structure of the sentence in a youth and in adulthood, endlessly improving our ability to handle text-education in the visual image will appear very poor and certainly inadequate and disparate.
I studied painting and I paint as much as making movies, but I know that I can not come to a film producer or a studio with ten pictures and five books of drawings and say, "Give me money."
They do not even understand what I mean, hell, I say.
They do not understand what I suggest.
They need a text - they need words - they will have something that actually belongs to the bookstore and not a movie.
And this despite the fact that we have always believed that film - it is a visual medium.
And if the text or script has successfully established itself in the market, as in the case of "Harry Potter" or "Lord of the Rings" - the better.
And it goes without assumes that all movies that you've ever seen - not a movie, and - assuming that the film was invented in 1895 - one hundred sixteen years of illustrated text.
So none of us had never seen the movie, we saw only an illustrated text. Thus, the cinema - a secondary medium. Our film is based on the text.
It does not matter, Godard you or Tarantino, Almodovar and Lars Von Trier, Martin Scorsese and James Cameron, is how we invent and build a movie - an illustration of the word.
And I do not like it.
A simple illustration does not satisfy me.
That is, after all that we do not film composers and conductors.
And that, I think, not what we want.
Conductors, of course, are also necessary, but the composer is ten thousand times more valuable.
If there are composers, conductors can be dispensed with, but you can not do without the composers, conductors, if only.
That is why, I believe, the language of film is so poor today.
So what do we do with this?
First of all, we all agree that the text there are many ways to prolong his life, poetry, novels, short stories, theater - more than enough to balance the text and not absorbed film.
And that is why we fully come to the fact that the movie should be reserved for the visual.
And therefore decide what visual education should become an essential part of compulsory general education program.
And that is why I personally believe that we need to film artists and creators of the image, not words writers and blacksmiths - whose appearance in the modern way of thinking is not so likely, but at least the onset of the digital revolution will become a necessity.
For new filmmakers, I'd go not to the bookshop and art school.
 (...)
Perhaps in the cinema of the future, if this is destined to occur, the two main words are "interactivity" and "multimedia".
Cinema of the future must be interactive and multimedia.
But all the same movie to die - so that our great-grandchildren will say: "Movie - and that is all there?"
But if the movie dies, painting - ever.
This is one of six types of art that were created long ago, existed up to now and will continue to exist.
So I congratulate you on the fact that you have chosen painting - the most important thing in your world.
I think you made a wise choice.
The artists we need, more than anyone else ...

[Fed]

Originally Posted by Yury Ryabchenyuk; 1895041"

The first known to us the creation of human hands is a picture .

Is a stone knife .
I hope the rest of this speech is not so controversial.
 But if it does not call it a " lecture ", but it is an event - stories , for example , 6 kinds of art (?) Would be perceived simply as stories.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Originally Posted by Fed

is a stone knife.

Stone Knife "creation"?
Here, it seems to me, "creation" of the word "creativity."
Stone knife while here - a tool "brush-mastehin."

[artcol]

Magnificent director (?).
The artist, by the way, the Education ...
His paintings - paintings he does See his picture in good quality on the big screen - with what incomparable pleasure.