E. M. Bebutov

[Homoludens]

[QUOTE=P_Anna;3326511]Repin - portrait Mihalcioiu@

Under the portrait at the bottom right I see only the signature (not Repin) ?

[P_Anna]

Homoludens, a little closer image. Have not been here to post a separate topic, wait for the opinions of experts on the graph.
Mihalcea E. P.-student of archaeology..

[Homoludens]

P_Anna, thank you, so much the better. Now clearly see the initials I. R. the shape of letters - Repin.

[P_Anna]

Homoludens, thank You for the opinion!) Confidence in the authenticity added!
If You don't mind, look a little closer, without bias in the theme of "published" again. I will continue to try to find the truth, do not leave me, the idea of authorship Kryzhitsky; if not strong study - could, in the end, the artist should not in the mood... for example.
In x-ray visible work to restoration and renovations, spotting much less.

[Solovlad]

Good time.
So lean that the original portrait.
According to Marina, the signature is questionable, the figure itself to say good difficulty.
With HC.

[P_Anna]

Solovlad, good night to You as well)
In the hands of the old conclusion of 2003 from the head.the Department of graphic TG L. Carstensen - so far.
AK looked under the microscope - paper, Sepia old. Similar signatures found in your registry signatures. Similar works by the artist have found a lot of the time will show) Thank you!)